Skip to main content

FLUX.2 Klein

Rank

#5

Score

24

Price

$0.012

FLUX.2 Klein scores 23.9 on our photo-anchored scale, where a real photograph is 100; it is the lowest rung of the ladder. In blind pairwise tests on 48 commercial scenes it fell clearly behind Qwen Image 2.0, GPT Image 2 and the reference photographs, and it was the model furthest from the photographs. Use it for drafts and exploration rather than final photoreal images.

Vendor
Black Forest Labs
Family
FLUX
Type
T2I
Modalities
→
License
FLUX Non-Commercial
Released
Jan 15, 2026
Max resolution
1K
Best for
Interior

Where it stands

A real photograph is pinned at 100, and every model sits by how often it won blind comparisons — the further left, the less often. Scroll sideways to see the rest of the ruler.

  • 64 · #5

    • The real photograph was preferred in 2 of 3 blind comparisons

    • Even in 3 blind comparisons

    • The real photograph was preferred in 2 of 3 blind comparisons

    • The real photograph was preferred in 1 of 3 blind comparisons

    • The real photograph was preferred in 3 of 3 blind comparisons

    • Preferred over the real photograph in 3 of 3 blind comparisons

  • 49 · #5

    • Preferred over the real photograph in 2 of 3 blind comparisons

    • The real photograph was preferred in 2 of 3 blind comparisons

    • The real photograph was preferred in 3 of 3 blind comparisons

    • The real photograph was preferred in 2 of 3 blind comparisons

    • The real photograph was preferred in 3 of 3 blind comparisons

    • The real photograph was preferred in 3 of 3 blind comparisons

  • 47 · #5

    • The real photograph was preferred in 3 of 3 blind comparisons

    • The real photograph was preferred in 3 of 3 blind comparisons

    • The real photograph was preferred in 2 of 3 blind comparisons

    • The real photograph was preferred in 2 of 3 blind comparisons

    • The real photograph was preferred in 3 of 3 blind comparisons

    • Preferred over the real photograph in 2 of 3 blind comparisons

  • 43 · #5

    • Even in 3 blind comparisons

    • The real photograph was preferred in 3 of 3 blind comparisons

    • The real photograph was preferred in 2 of 3 blind comparisons

    • The real photograph was preferred in 3 of 3 blind comparisons

    • Preferred over the real photograph in 2 of 3 blind comparisons

    • The real photograph was preferred in 3 of 3 blind comparisons

  • 34 · #5

    • The real photograph was preferred in 2 of 3 blind comparisons

    • The real photograph was preferred in 3 of 3 blind comparisons

    • The real photograph was preferred in 1 of 3 blind comparisons

    • The real photograph was preferred in 2 of 3 blind comparisons

    • The real photograph was preferred in 2 of 3 blind comparisons

    • Preferred over the real photograph in 1 of 3 blind comparisons

  • −21 · #5

    • The real photograph was preferred in 3 of 3 blind comparisons

    • The real photograph was preferred in 3 of 3 blind comparisons

    • The real photograph was preferred in 1 of 3 blind comparisons

    • The real photograph was preferred in 2 of 3 blind comparisons

    • The real photograph was preferred in 2 of 3 blind comparisons

    • The real photograph was preferred in 2 of 3 blind comparisons

  • −41 · #5

    • The real photograph was preferred in 3 of 3 blind comparisons

    • The real photograph was preferred in 3 of 3 blind comparisons

    • The real photograph was preferred in 1 of 3 blind comparisons

    • The real photograph was preferred in 3 of 3 blind comparisons

    • The real photograph was preferred in 3 of 3 blind comparisons

    • The real photograph was preferred in 3 of 3 blind comparisons

  • −56 · #5

    • The real photograph was preferred in 3 of 3 blind comparisons

    • The real photograph was preferred in 3 of 3 blind comparisons

    • The real photograph was preferred in 3 of 3 blind comparisons

    • The real photograph was preferred in 3 of 3 blind comparisons

    • The real photograph was preferred in 3 of 3 blind comparisons

    • The real photograph was preferred in 3 of 3 blind comparisons

When to use

Same brief, side by side

Prompt used:A Black woman with long locs, bare shoulders and a strapless cream top stands among dense tropical foliage and looks calmly into the lens. She holds an amber glass dropper bottle with a gold cap up in front of her chest with both hands, fingertips lightly touching it. Broad green leaves and tall reed stems fill the background; a blurred leaf crosses the bottom of the frame.

Even in 3 blind comparisons

View all 48 scenes →

Expert evaluation

Would use with caveats
The floor of the ladder, and useful as one: it shows how far the stronger rungs move a brief. I would sketch directions in it, but nothing that has to read as a photograph should leave it unfinished.

Strengths

  • Open-weights model at the floor of the ladder
  • A clear baseline that shows how far stronger models move a brief

Weaknesses

  • Clearly behind Qwen Image 2.0
  • Clearly behind GPT Image 2
  • Furthest of all tested models from real photographs

Rater agreement is low by the usual yardstick (Fleiss' kappa 0.16–0.20). Half the pairs compare adjacent tiers, where “equal” is an honest answer. Conclusions hold at the level of the whole corpus, not for a single scene, pair or rater.

Dmitry Shironosov

Dmitry Shironosov

Head of AI Research, Everypixel Workroom

What it costs

API list prices for FLUX.2 Klein
ProviderPriceChecked
Black Forest LabsFirst megapixelfrom $0.015 / imgSep 25, 2026
fal.ai$0.006 per megapixel, 1 MP$0.006 / imgSep 25, 2026
DeepInfraScales with size, 1024×1024$0.015 / imgSep 25, 2026
WaveSpeedAIFlat rate for any size$0.01 / imgSep 25, 2026

Prices are for one 1024×1024 image at standard settings, checked 25 September 2026; the price at the top of the page is the average of the providers listed. Workroom pricing is on the pricing page.

Workroom pricing →

License and terms

FLUX.2 Klein comes with open weights from Black Forest Labs in two sizes. The larger one, tested here, is released under the FLUX Non-Commercial License; the smaller one is released under Apache 2.0.

Frequently asked questions

About Workroom

Workroom is an AI router: we give access to third-party models, including FLUX.2 Klein, and we are not affiliated with Black Forest Labs. We have no stake in any single vendor winning; the router is only useful if it sends each brief to the right model. The judgement-level data behind this card is published by Everypixel research under CC BY 4.0 and linked below, so every number here can be checked independently.

How we tested

Between 21 and 25 August 2026 we compared four rungs of our quality ladder blind on 48 commercial scenes: FLUX.2 Klein, Qwen Image 2, GPT Image 2 and the real photographs each scene was written from. Every rung was paired with every other on every scene — 288 pairs and 863 judgements — and each pair was judged three times, without any indication of which image came from which model, on three questions: which image follows the prompt better, which is more believable as a real photograph, and which is more attractive.

How the scale is built

Pairwise comparisons are fitted with a Bradley–Terry model; intervals come from bootstrapping over scenes. The rungs of the scale are frozen from the baseline study, so every new model lands on the same scale. The score uses believability only:

score = 100 + (strength - strength_gold) / a

A real photograph is pinned at 100 by definition; slope 0.020835 strength per point; calibration points: floor, mid, gold. Category positions are fitted the same way on the 6 scenes of each category, with a real photograph pinned at 100 on every one of them.

Direct blind tests

The pairs FLUX.2 Klein was judged against directly — where its place on the scale comes from.

Qwen Image 2.0 was preferred over FLUX.2 Klein in 69% of blind comparisons.

Gap (Bradley–Terry)
−0.85 (interval not published)
Preference
31.4% of blind comparisons preferred it (ties split, all questions, vote share)
Prompt adherence17 preferred · 47 equal · 80 other preferred
Believability22 preferred · 34 equal · 88 other preferred
Aesthetics41 preferred · 30 equal · 73 other preferred

144 blind comparisons, each pair shown 3 times

GPT Image 2 was preferred over FLUX.2 Klein in 83% of blind comparisons.

Gap (Bradley–Terry)
−1.68 (interval not published)
Preference
16.7% of blind comparisons preferred it (ties split, all questions, vote share)
Prompt adherence5 preferred · 37 equal · 102 other preferred
Believability9 preferred · 27 equal · 108 other preferred
Aesthetics11 preferred · 30 equal · 103 other preferred

144 blind comparisons, each pair shown 3 times

vs Real photograph

The real photograph was preferred over FLUX.2 Klein in 74% of blind comparisons.

Gap (Bradley–Terry)
−1.59 (interval not published)
Preference
26.0% of blind comparisons preferred it (ties split, all questions, vote share)
Prompt adherence28 preferred · 46 equal · 70 other preferred
Believability17 preferred · 22 equal · 105 other preferred
Aesthetics21 preferred · 25 equal · 98 other preferred

144 blind comparisons, each pair shown 3 times

Open data

Every image, every vote and every number behind the scores, so the conclusions can be checked independently.

Data: CC BY 4.0. Images: All rights reserved; ten Unsplash photographs under the Unsplash License.

Read these before reusing the data

  • Prompt adherence is biased against the photograph: each prompt was written by looking at the photograph, and a model executes text literally, while a photograph always contains incidental detail the description does not mention. Raters count that as a miss — which is why the absolute scale is built on believability alone.
  • The share of ties is inflated: during collection the “equal” option was pre-selected, so a criterion the rater never touched was recorded as a genuine tie. The defect was fixed on 28 August 2026, after this data was collected. Tier ordering survives it: dropping every tie only widens the gaps.
  • All images were shown at 2048 px on the long edge — native output size for the generative tiers; the photographs were downscaled from 30–45 megapixels. On screen the photographs are not softer than the generated images.

Read the full study →

Cite this page

<blockquote cite="https://workroom.everypixel.com/models/flux-2-klein">
  <p>FLUX.2 Klein scores 23.9 on our photo-anchored scale, where a real photograph is 100; it is the lowest rung of the ladder.</p>
  <footer>&mdash; <a href="https://workroom.everypixel.com/models/flux-2-klein">FLUX.2 Klein benchmark: blind pairwise test</a>, Everypixel Workroom, August 2026</footer>
</blockquote>

Everypixel Workroom. (2026). FLUX.2 Klein benchmark: blind pairwise test. https://workroom.everypixel.com/models/flux-2-klein